Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official E3 2011 Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I had a massive reply to this orginally but it took so long to write I got logged out and lost it, so I'm rewriting a skimmed down version for Pikminister.

    I had very little I could reply to directly because either you comments I agreed with or it's just my difference of opinion I've already stated, with exception to the following...

    Originally posted by Pikminister View Post
    The Wii installed user base is 90 million not 36 million. Even if only half of them still have one, that's a good chunk of people that Ninty could cash in on. The WiiU is basically designed to be an upgrade to the Wii. The whole concept of re-using the Mii's, wiimote, Virtual Console downloads, etc. on the WiiU makes me believe that theory... So that anyone that STILL hangs on to the Wii, will IMO seriously consider upgrading. I dunno why that theory seems so out there for you, dewd. Seems to me that updating to the WiiU would be the natural thing to do for any Wii owner.
    Firstly yeah, sorry I only wrote the US only numbers (estimated somewhere between 35-36 million) when I meant to put in the worldwides. The thing is though by the end of the last financial year, so just a few months back, Nintendo was supposed to have sold over 45 million in the US alone based on their holiday sales from 2 years ago. It shows you how much it's dropped off.

    Back to the responce, there are numerous reasons why people would consider not upgrading. First and foremost on my mind originally, and something some people have gleefully mentioned above, is just how many of those 90 million even use their Wii currently. If you have a console collecting dust then it's unlikely you're going to upgrade.

    The average age of a Wii owner is lot younger than that of a 360 or PS3 owner I would say so I think cost is prohibitive.

    Additionally if the games they want turn out the same on the Wii-U compared to the PS3 and 360 then it might be a cheaper option to switch to another console when the Wii-U launches.

    My original post had several other things but quite simply my point was that releasing half way in a generation with something which on it's first preview looks like a catch up and not a game changer is definently going to be a harder sell.

    Well in my opinion... Nintendo wasn't actually ready to unveil the WiiU at this point in time. Thus the lack of games and why even the controller was still in its BETA form.

    They only did this because they felt that they were forced into it. The Wii's popularity was going down. And waiting until next year to announce it (or even later in September) would not help their chances at keeping the Wii brand name alive. You see, Nintendo wants to cash in on that brand. And that's why they took this gamble of releasing info about the WiiU despite it not being 100% ready for showtime. So a lot of details have yet to be worked out. There is time for that, though.
    I totally agree they were forced, it's the same reason I mentioned it's reactionary of Nintendo this time. Not even including a drop in sales to the mix, they're listening to consumers, developers, and the like on what they'd want to see it and crafting it around trying to be a crowd pleaser. And to do that it's modern gaming, HD, online, hardcore market etc. etc. added to Nintendo's core business model.

    The issue with it is, well firstly Nintendo seems to want to run this like they do with the DS/3DS and have both on market at the same time. I don't think they're that sure about it but will wait to see what the market uptake on the Wii-U will be before the severing of certain Wii ties.

    Secondly the thing is a double edged sword. They're forced to showcase this thing very early, still a year away most likely. But that early showcase will sever Wii sales as they stand because anyone thinking about picking up a Wii who hasn't will not now, they'll wait for the Wii-U.

    Additionally with Nintendo spending so much time focusing on the Wii-U at this event and not so much on the 3DS, I'm willing to bet there are also some non-early 3DS adopters now sitting on the fence a bit longer to see what Nintendo's future holds.

    Changing the point away from the Wii-U slightly finally, out of Nintendo's control somewhat, one of the stupidest E3 moments I've ever heard of. Sega backpeddled earlier today, according to a story on Kotaku, and said that Aliens: Colonial Marines coming to the Wii-U is only a possibility, not actuality. If thats the case you shouldn't say it is at all.

    There is a difference between vaporware announced for a console and then it just changes or dissapears, but for you to announce a game coming to other consoles also appearing on this when you're actually not sure about it at all.... is a bit FUBAR on the announcement front.
    Last edited by Rombie; 06-08-2011, 07:27 AM.

    Comment


    • The ol' wall of text defense. Yeah I tried that one before too.

      Comment


      • Nintendo have admitted now that the footage they were showing of third party Wii-U games was running on other platforms, heck there was even a small piece captured with Fraps (check the top of the screen HERE, and check what Reggie said about it HERE). I don't get why people are excited about them coming along and announcing they're making a console with games that will be multiplatform and look just as good as stuff on consoles made 5/6 years ago. That's not impressive that's pathetic
        Last edited by rewak; 06-08-2011, 09:14 AM.

        Comment


        • Indeed, makes me remember the time I dubbed it the worst new console in the history of the world.

          Comment


          • Actually, EA's CEO believes the Wii U is more powerful than the PS3 and the 360. The screens weren't from the console's engine because it isn't ready for presentation and it won't arrive until Holiday 2012 (Fils-Aime something along the lines to Adam Sessler that the emphasis for this holiday season is the 3DS and next year it'll be Wii U).

            Plus, we have some specs: http://kotaku.com/5809598/whats-unde...ills-the-chips

            While I'm more interested in the Vita, this seems top of the line indeed.
            Last edited by GuardhouseMusic; 06-08-2011, 10:57 AM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              Firstly yeah, sorry I only wrote the US only numbers (estimated somewhere between 35-36 million) when I meant to put in the worldwides. The thing is though by the end of the last financial year, so just a few months back, Nintendo was supposed to have sold over 45 million in the US alone based on their holiday sales from 2 years ago. It shows you how much it's dropped off.
              No, that shows you how unrealistic Reggie's expectations were. He was riding the wave of the frst 3 years of the Wii's explosive popularity and thought it would last for another 3 years. But eventually, everyone and their dog had a Wii and the demand died down (among those that wanted one, that is).

              The Wii sold 15 million units in the recent fiscal year. YOY its a drop in demand. However, its still higher numbers than what the PS3 sold in the same time frame. The demand is still there, but not as strong as it was 2 years ago. Obviously.


              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              Back to the responce, there are numerous reasons why people would consider not upgrading. First and foremost on my mind originally, and something some people have gleefully mentioned above, is just how many of those 90 million even use their Wii currently. If you have a console collecting dust then it's unlikely you're going to upgrade.
              Well I couldn't help to notice that a lot of those glee-filled users are presently next-gen users that use their (imaginary) Wii's as dust collectors (there's craigslist and ebay, guys- sell it!). And who were happy as hell to UPGRADE to a next gen console at some point. Gee, I wonder why they did that. You know, upgrading from their PS2, Wii, Xbox or Atari.

              See, your theory that Wii users will not upgrade eventually to an HD device doesn't hold water in my opinion. Makes no sense. Especially for a console that keeps selling every day, every week... see, the demand has not ended yet. It keeps selling. Ppl still use it. I know you think that is IMPOSSIBLE, but I tell you, they do. Trust me on that.

              Oh, here's a little known fact: EVERY GAME CONSOLE STARTS TO COLLECT DUST THE MOMENT YOU PULL IT OUT OF THE BOX AND PLACE IT AROUND YOUR HOUSE. Unless you live inside a BUBBLE, anything (including YOU) will start to collect dust.

              Sorry for the all caps, but it gets annoying to keep reading the whole 'dust collector' thing. Its a dusty world and even in Space do you find stuff that starts collecting dust. Anyway, lets move on...

              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              The average age of a Wii owner is lot younger than that of a 360 or PS3 owner I would say so I think cost is prohibitive.
              1.- Kids are not the main target either for the Wii or Wii U. And the average Wii user is actually a lot older than PS3, 360 owners. Thus why fanboys kept saying that the Wii is a retirement home/Soccer mom magnet. And there was a study done a year or two a while back that made it clear that Wii users are even OLDER than PS3 and 360 users (over 35 years old). Making more than one to consider that a lot of those users are old school gamers or something.

              You gotta update your Nintendo stereotypes, man. The Wii was NOT a teletubbie handbag a.k.a. Gamecube. Casuals are not kids. They are mostly adults. That's why they don't play as much as KIDS do. Every day at every hour.

              Anywhoo, I don't get why you keep rehashing the kids only stereotype from the cube days. Gotta update yourself on that, dewd!

              Back on topic...

              2.- Even if kids were the target for the Wii/WiiU and they have ZERO/little buying power as you suggest... then how do you explain the Wii selling like crazy 2 years back?

              Hmmmm?

              How do you explain Disney, Mattel, Toys R Us and other kid friendly businesses making BILLIONS each year out of those penniless kids?

              Yeah, I don't get how people think kids have no buying power... considering they have loving parents that DO have $$$$$$.

              Its the parents. Who ended up becoming Wii users. And thus why the average Wii user is over 35 years old. Yeah...

              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              My original post had several other things but quite simply my point was that releasing half way in a generation with something which on it's first preview looks like a catch up and not a game changer is definently going to be a harder sell.
              And that's why it will be sold as an UPGRADE. That's why its still called a Wii - something. Its a direct sequel. Not a fresh start or a brand new concept that its designed to be totally different. But merely an upgrade.

              And that's the reason that its being released halfway within this generation. Because its an upgrade. It was something that the Wii brand needed to stay alive when the current generation ends in 2-3 years. The current Wii could not stay alive at the end of those 2-3 years. So the Wii U was needed.

              What exactly did you expect Nintendo to do? Spend the next 2-3 years watching the Wii die and reading reports and analysis saying how dead it is?

              Adding more peripherals and add-ons to the present Wii console wouldn't work. 3rd party support was down. 1st party game production had been re-directed to the 3DS. Only Zelda has been billed as the last great Nintendo title for the Wii. It was over.

              So they had to come up with something to stay alive for the next 2-3 years on the home console front... don't you agree?

              If you care about the company, sure you agree. They had no choice but to UPGRADE the Wii. Give it a booster shot.

              But if you don't care about the company... then you probably wished they had done nothing.

              Its that simple, really.

              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              Secondly the thing is a double edged sword. They're forced to showcase this thing very early, still a year away most likely. But that early showcase will sever Wii sales as they stand because anyone thinking about picking up a Wii who hasn't will not now, they'll wait for the Wii-U.
              The Wii U announcement at E3 is merely a PR move. To remind consumers that they can expect a new Wii (upgrade) next year.

              Just like Apple likes to release info of their new and improved iPad two weeks after releasing one to the market. People still get all excited and they wait for the upgrade. It happens all the time. Its not really a rare thing.

              Now, Wii sales are going down regardless of what Nintendo does. So it doesn't matter at this point if the Wii U makes any headlines that steal the Wii's thunder (or sales). At this stage of the game, Nintendo wants to send the message to Wii owners that an upgrade is coming. That they can export their downloaded games, Mii's and whatever to the new console.

              And who knows, maybe Nintendo will team up with GameStop and offer consumers an exchange program. Bring your original Wii over and get a discount for the Wii U. (It will still happen though.... GameStop does it all the time).


              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              Additionally with Nintendo spending so much time focusing on the Wii-U at this event and not so much on the 3DS, I'm willing to bet there are also some non-early 3DS adopters now sitting on the fence a bit longer to see what Nintendo's future holds.
              Actually, news and gaming sites are complaining because quite the opposite is happening. Nintendo is not releasing any more info on the Wii U at all. And instead, they are only accepting questions in regards to the 3DS and Wii.

              And maybe you missed the conference, but a lot of 3DS stuff was mentioned. Including the eShop thing and the games that are coming for it. Including the sequel to my favorite cube game, Luigis Mansion.

              Originally posted by Rombie View Post
              Changing the point away from the Wii-U slightly finally, out of Nintendo's control somewhat, one of the stupidest E3 moments I've ever heard of. Sega backpeddled earlier today, according to a story on Kotaku, and said that Aliens: Colonial Marines coming to the Wii-U is only a possibility, not actuality. If thats the case you shouldn't say it is at all.

              There is a difference between vaporware announced for a console and then it just changes or dissapears, but for you to announce a game coming to other consoles also appearing on this when you're actually not sure about it at all.... is a bit FUBAR on the announcement front.
              Nintendo admitted today that they used a PS3/360 reel showing some core games that could come to the Wii U. Again, that whole side of things is a work in progress thing.

              It also helps clear the smoke about why Wii U 3rd party games looked like PS3/360 games.

              About the Aliens game... nothing has been confirmed if the game goes or doesn't go to the Wii U. So its not really a FUBAR moment.. yet.
              Stuff to remember: Avoid forums if you're having a bad day.
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Details on NGP/PS Vita Silent Hill:
                They're making a portable Silent Hill game for Sony's Vita (you know...Sony's next handheld... the PSP2, the NGP). And it's a multiplayer game.

                Sounds like it's going to be... Multiplayer.. Unnnggghhhh..

                Oh, and Pikminister, keep fighting the good fight. *salutes*
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Geoff Keighley's been sitting in on dev roundtables with Nintendo at E3. As far as Wii U's online multiplayer is concerned:

                  Sounds like each game on Wii-U has to set up its own online network.....no unifying Nintendo service, at least not yet. Box checked?


                  That's pretty pathetic.
                  Last edited by Vector; 06-08-2011, 10:16 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Pikminister View Post
                    About the Aliens game... nothing has been confirmed if the game goes or doesn't go to the Wii U. So its not really a FUBAR moment.. yet.

                    This just in...

                    Comment


                    • Wii-U Scraps Friend Codes, Uses Friend Lists + Usernames
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Scream - I wish it was just the wall of text defence, it was really just the wall of text frustration at loss of original post reply defence :p

                        Pik - For some reason you keep calling me dewd which is weird, and while I have lots of reasons to reply to your extended wall of reply, between the two I give up. I don't agree yet I don't disagree with everything either, clearly I just have a viewpoint thats different than yours. Just too much damn text to reply to point to point.

                        Edit - Finally, I retract the comment about A:CM based on the later updates by Pickford.
                        Last edited by Rombie; 06-08-2011, 10:56 PM.

                        Comment


                        • Usernames? Friend lists? Proof of beefed up online?

                          I say yes. Nipples harder?

                          I say yes.

                          Comment


                          • Yeah I actually didn't read it, I just assumed you were going for the wall of text strategy, which pik just successfully pulled off

                            Comment


                            • So who won E3? Most would say Sony but the real winner is all the really cool shit that wasn't shown on any of the 3 conferences. =/

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Scream View Post
                                Yeah I actually didn't read it, I just assumed you were going for the wall of text strategy, which pik just successfully pulled off
                                Oh yeah, when I saw that combined with how much I lost writing/in time last time... I was like this time, screw it - he can take this as a win if he wants cause I can't be assed with replying to it all. :p


                                This whole E3 has not had much in the way of surprise announcements, especially ones which have been showcased. Most of the stuff has been pre announced. It takes me back to the E3's pre-2000 when there used to be 2 TGS events a year, and one of them was prior to E3 and so a lot of Japanese stuff from those turned up which we already knew about. It's just a lot of developers put on their own expo/showcase or things are frequently announced at the end of the year at stuff like the shitfest that is VGA's has contributed. Either that or the cunning gaming journos out there now find out early and post it on the net as well.
                                Last edited by Rombie; 06-09-2011, 05:54 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X