Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who's worse: Boll or Anderson?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who's worse: Boll or Anderson?

    I've seen a massive amount of bitching about Paul WS Anderson's Resident Evil movies, and I want to know if people think that he's so bad, would he be worse than Uwe Boll? Personally, I think Boll is a total fucking 'tard.

    Vote your answer!

  • #2
    Aside from the fact it has no poll attached.... this is like asking who do you like more... Hitler or Tony Blair. :p

    Boll for sure. Anderson's movies are actually watchable and he doesn't just do videogame movies (his next film due is a remake of the cult 70's film Death Race 2000) unlike Boll who's basically never going to leave them now. Say what you will about the RE movies, but I'm happy to see them compared to the shit that Boll has done over the last several years.
    Last edited by Rombie; 07-07-2008, 06:37 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Boll. As bad as the RE movies are they aren't anything compared to the pure, undiluted suck that comes off every project Uwe Boll touches. The man has an Epic Fail field. Everything he's involved with turns to Fail.

      If Boll had done RE there wouldn't even be zombies in it. That's how bad that man is.

      Comment


      • #4
        True, but who's worse, the guy you know's a failure or a terrible director who's successful at it?

        Anderson gets my vote.

        Comment


        • #5
          ...you're gonna have to clarify which is which Dude.

          Comment


          • #6
            Failure = Boll financially
            Financial Success therefore worse for producing shit content = Anderson.
            Therefore who's worse? = Anderson.

            Comment


            • #7
              They both suck.
              Finally playing 1.5. Woo-Hoo!!!

              sigpic

              Comment


              • #8
                I tried to add a poll, but screwed up somewhere. Maybe a mod can do it for me?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Anderson has $13 of mine. Boll doesn't.
                  I hate Andserson more
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Did you divide that against his royalties? He probably only got about 20 cents.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Regardless of the quality of the adaptations themselves, Boll's movies still suck as movies in general. Anderson's can be enjoyed as non-game movies on some hands also.

                      Boll is worse for sure.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Boll. What a stupid question.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Not stupid, rhetorical

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            A more suitable question would be "Whats worse, Boll or colonic irrigation", and even then Boll would still be the answer,

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              What's wrong with colonic irrigation? :B

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X