So, William and Annette were just ordinary Umbrella researchers, with William finding about about Umbrella's wrongdoings and subsequently, trying to stop them. Then William somehow got infected with G, and his wife went nuts and spread T to Raccoon. So Willam wasn't in bed with Umbrella like in retail, let alone their lead scientist. If this is true, then, who created the G-virus?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BIOHAZARD 1.5 Scenario Excerpts
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by News Bot View PostI don't think any other villains in the series are suddenly repentant and decide to escape with the main heroes.
Originally posted by towerofpowerx View PostSo, William and Annette were just ordinary Umbrella researchers, with William finding about about Umbrella's wrongdoings and subsequently, trying to stop them. Then William somehow got infected with G, and his wife went nuts and spread T to Raccoon. So Willam wasn't in bed with Umbrella like in retail, let alone their lead scientist. If this is true, then, who created the G-virus?Last edited by AsteroidBlues; 01-19-2013, 11:53 PM.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by towerofpowerx View PostSo, William and Annette were just ordinary Umbrella researchers, with William finding about about Umbrella's wrongdoings and subsequently, trying to stop them. Then William somehow got infected with G, and his wife went nuts and spread T to Raccoon. So Willam wasn't in bed with Umbrella like in retail, let alone their lead scientist. If this is true, then, who created the G-virus?PROJECT Umbrella - The BIOHAZARD/RESIDENT EVIL Compendium
Comment
-
I see it now.....it reminds me about what was spoken about in the Wesker Reports. Lemme find it......ah, here's the excerpt I was looking for:
At the time, I was only a youngster so it didn't bother the
president. The president understood what Spencer was thinking
and didn't take notice of someone like me. While the three of
us were on the elevator, Birkin kept his eyes on the research
files. The files contained information about a new firo-virus
found 2 years ago in Africa called Ebora. Even now there are
thousands of people researching the Ebora. But the people are
always divided in half -- one group dedicated to saving people
from the virus, and the other to kill people with it.
It is known if a person is infected with the Ebora, that the
chance of dying is 90%. It has the quality to destroy the physical
structure within 10 days and even now, a cure hasn't been found.
If used as a bio-weapon it would display incredible destruction.
But because making a bio-weapon is against the law we would not
use the virus as a weapon. But I'm certain that someone out there
would use this as a weapon. So to prepare for a case of that
nature it is good to do research on it now. But the line between
finding a cure and making a bio-weapon is thin. This is because
the actual research conducted do not differ at all between the two.
So one could say that they are reseaching for a cure and be making
a bio-weapon.
So the question becomes, were William and Annette aware their reasearch would be used to kill people all along, only to have their conscience's catch up with them when it actually happened? Or were they part of the group that believed they were researching a cure all this time? Because if you look at what the G-Virus initially does i.e. revitalizing dead cells continously to ward off death, the G-Virus could be construed as a "cure", albeit an incomplete one due to the rampant, uncontrollable mutations that took place afterwards. As I recall, in retail the G-Virus was classified as "nearing it's completion" (in the letter from William to Chief Irons), but William was taken out before he had the chance to perfect G.It matters not to me which virus you wield. Yours is merely a pathetic attempt to master the powers of death. The power you seek is MINE, and with this insurmountable power, I offer a litany of oblivion even a virus cannot prevent..............and you cannot escape.
Comment
-
Originally posted by News Bot View PostI don't think any other villains in the series are suddenly repentant and decide to escape with the main heroes.
One thing that can be argued, Anette escaping Raccon City would have absolutely set up a sequel for the series following 1.5. It would have even set up a possible "RE1.9" opportunity where the player could learn more about Anette following a side story, similar to like Capcom did with RE3. Anette surviving would have turned her into more of a super villain of the series, someone who ( assuming Capcom persued her survivial) dominates the story over multiple titles, like Wesker or Ada, as opposed to someone who dies there and then, and perhaps that's something that factored into their decisions at one point.
Who was Ada in 1.5? Was her personality as strong as Anettes? Was her role as integral to the story? These sorts of decisions really paved the way for how a lot of the story would go in the future, it's understandable how you would want to reconsider how you portray your characters and who you want to introduce to the series on a long term basis. From this perspective I can really say they made a lot of right decisions in the retail game, they created iconic characters who fueled a hugely succesful series for next years to come, you can't fault that decision to do what they did.
Comment
-
I had a cool thought. What if during the fight with the final boss, Leon becomes badly wounded and a cinematic triggers. The only way to defeat a G monster is with another G monster, so Annette injects herself with the G-Virus and mutates into G-Annette. She then kills said boss, but then turns her attention to Leon. Now Leon gets back on his feet and you have to fight G-Annette.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darkness View PostAnnette goes commando and decimates the U.S.S soldiers who are probably running around with the Assault Rifle in the Retail Cutscenes, the one you can actually use in 1.5, and that sweet looking white armor? I'd like to see her do that LMAO.
Originally posted by geluda View PostWho knows?! While we spend most of our time battling with William throughout the main stages of 1.5 perhaps Anette decides to inject her self on the train at the last minute and turn her self into the last boss. I imagine you'd have a lot better idea than me with all the developer research you've done, so it's just wishful thinking for a plausible ending on my part.
One thing that can be argued, Anette escaping Raccon City would have absolutely set up a sequel for the series following 1.5. It would have even set up a possible "RE1.9" opportunity where the player could learn more about Anette following a side story, similar to like Capcom did with RE3. Anette surviving would have turned her into more of a super villain of the series, someone who ( assuming Capcom persued her survivial) dominates the story over multiple titles, like Wesker or Ada, as opposed to someone who dies there and then, and perhaps that's something that factored into their decisions at one point.
Comment
-
The following comments are from one of the character, enemy and texture designers of BH1, BH1.5 and BH2.
Yes, that's it. The first piece (Spider Monster) was a picture by Oishi, the character designer, but I did the design. I drew the second and third (Monkey Monster). It became a gorilla, but I think it was a hamadryad (Papio hamadryas). Since it was long ago, I don't remember the name. I also don't think it was involved with the scenario.
Most of the enemies of 1.5 were frozen since they had a low degree of perfection. They were my responsibility. I don't know any of the enemy details anymore, it was a long time ago.PROJECT Umbrella - The BIOHAZARD/RESIDENT EVIL Compendium
Comment
-
BH 1.5 was a lot more cold and cynical than I thought.
Teaming up with the person who caused the outbreak and decimated an entire city out of spite and for revenge to survive is as hardcore as it gets.
It's not easy to sell that dark narrative. And quite frankly, I don't think that Capcom would be capable of delivering it. But such idea had potential if the execution would not be botched.Last edited by Kegluneq; 01-20-2013, 07:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kegluneq View PostBH 1.5 was a lot more cold and cynical than I thought.
Teaming up with the person who caused the outbreak and decimated an entire city out of spite and for revenge to survive is as hardcore as it gets.
It's not easy to sell that dark narrative. And quite frankly, I don't think that Capcom would be capable of delivering it. But such idea had potential if the execution would not botched.
Missed potential IMO. A darker story in the BIO universe would have made for an epic game.
Now I wonder what The Team is going to do story wise. Are they going to stick the the initial story of 1.5, or are they going to revise it to flow better.. Maybe the new information will be most beneficial to them.Last edited by Zombie_X; 01-20-2013, 07:13 PM.
Comment
-
Forgot about this:
Same, I guess. RT @NewsBotPU: Makes sense. Did Birkin inject himself with the G-Virus for a different reason in BH1.5 than in BH2?PROJECT Umbrella - The BIOHAZARD/RESIDENT EVIL Compendium
Comment
Comment