Resident Evil 3.5

[News Bot]

I wouldn't believe everything News Bot says. He has proved one thing to me, but the rest of his statements, I think are his opinions. Unless he shows hard evidence.

But to answer your question, I think the hallucination version was the one with the screen turning blue and things come to life, like the dolls.

If you want to live in denial I can't really stop you.

Nothing I've said in this topic is an opinion (unless otherwise stated).

The Castle version was the first trailer released for the game. The second trailer was the Hallucination version, which still used some elements from the Castle version for the trailer. The infamous gameplay video on the BH4 Secret DVD is pretty much the entire Hallucination version, for which only a small mansion existed.

[yurieu]

and there is something behind the rain but I can't make it out, probably a castle ?

uh, no. i do believe we have this trailer only from the E3 2003, filmed by someone, not teh trailer itself.

[Black~Crow]

If you want to live in denial I can't really stop you.

Nothing I've said in this topic is an opinion (unless otherwise stated).

The Castle version was the first trailer released for the game. The second trailer was the Hallucination version, which still used some elements from the Castle version for the trailer. The infamous gameplay video on the BH4 Secret DVD is pretty much the entire Hallucination version, for which only a small mansion existed.

Well, 9 times out of 10 you don't provide hard evidence, that is why I feel most of what you state are opinions. So, I will call you Opinion Bot.

[yurieu]

Opinion Bot.

Lmao

[News Bot]

Well, 9 times out of 10 you don't provide hard evidence, that is why I feel most of what you state are opinions. So, I will call you Opinion Bot.

And I've stated why I can't give that "hard evidence" which you would most likely accuse me of making up regardless. ;) All you need to know is that it came from the people who made it.

[Mrox2]

And I've stated why I can't give that "hard evidence" which you would most likely accuse me of making up regardless. ;) All you need to know is that it came from the people who made it.

But WE still can't be sure, you might be sure but we don't know anything, you could've been even trolled hard by the developers and just because they are EX devs you believed them or maybe you got something wrong or maybe you didn't even ask them but regardless maybe you are basing your views on whatever info you've got so far.
Provide a real proof that is believable and logical.
I for one believe you when you say something logical that makes sense, otherwise I'm entitled to what I think from what I know so far, I put it simply like that.

[Darkmoon]

I'll back News Bot up on this to a point. I have a little more knowledge about his situation that most of you will. While I disagree on the interpretation of his information on occasion, the information itself is good. He will, if asked, reveal what sources he can. But he's made promises and frankly his word alone should be more important to him that proving to us lot that he's being honest. Let alone the fact that those sources vanish like mist in the sun if he leaks things without consent.

Feel free to question stuff, I sure as hell do, but News Bot is usually right.

[News Bot]

But WE still can't be sure, you might be sure but we don't know anything, you could've been even trolled hard by the developers and just because they are EX devs you believed them or maybe you got something wrong or maybe you didn't even ask them but regardless maybe you are basing your views on whatever info you've got so far.
Provide a real proof that is believable and logical.
I for one believe you when you say something logical that makes sense, otherwise I'm entitled to what I think from what I know so far, I put it simply like that.

Right, you can't be sure. I mean, I've only spoken to the developers personally and all and almost every respected member of the community has vouched for me.

The idiotic notion of "proof" some have asked for despite being told precisely why I can't just go "X told me so" is ridiculous.

None of what I say in relation to this topic are my views or opinions, unless I otherwise say so. The rest is direct from the developers. I understand why you would be wary, but it's pretty unfounded in this instance. I don't exactly have a reputation as a liar. Maybe an asshole, but not a liar.

[Darkmoon]

Oh no, definitely as an asshole.

Also, does this mean I'm a respect member of the community now? And if so, how do I stop being one? It makes me feel...dirty.

But no, seriously, I've never known News Bot to lie. To get things wrong, sure. But not to lie. He's not Colvin.

[Mrox2]

Oh no, definitely as an asshole.

Also, does this mean I'm a respect member of the community now? And if so, how do I stop being one? It makes me feel...dirty.

But no, seriously, I've never known News Bot to lie. To get things wrong, sure. But not to lie. He's not Colvin.

Colvin is an ass hole then, but Newsbot is neither a liar or an ass hole, that's not what I see.

Right, you can't be sure. I mean, I've only spoken to the developers personally and all and almost every respected member of the community has vouched for me.

The idiotic notion of "proof" some have asked for despite being told precisely why I can't just go "X told me so" is ridiculous.

I know that Interview, not to be rude or anything but that's the only one I've seen.
Proof because everyone could say "someone told me that and that" and then everyone has to believe them, this is how random dumb people appear and claim to know things which they don't, I'm not forcing you or anything, If you don't have a proof it's ok but I could still hold up onto what I know and known publicly, I understand the privacy about it, soo ...

[News Bot]

It's the only one you've seen because the rest can't be publicly released for a variety of reasons. I have "proof", but it can't be released. You're free not to believe what I say about it, but you'd only be wrong.

[Black~Crow]

Colvin is an ass hole then, but Newsbot is neither a liar or an ass hole, that's not what I see.



I know that Interview, not to be rude or anything but that's the only one I've seen.
Proof because everyone could say "someone told me that and that" and then everyone has to believe them, this is how random dumb people appear and claim to know things which they don't, I'm not forcing you or anything, If you don't have a proof it's ok but I could still hold up onto what I know and known publicly, I understand the privacy about it, soo ...

This is why I don't believe everything I read on here. Anyone can say anything and show no proof because of one reason or another. But no offense News Bot, but I have read your dispute with someone, about the creature from RE1 and RE3, that spits acid. You kept insisting the creature didn't spit acid and then someone showed proof that it did, with a youtube video.

I am not stating everything News Bot is saying is a lie, but I have read a lot of his arguments which seem to be more of his opinion, like the example I mentioned.

Now, what I want to know is, if you know someone on the RE3.5 project, or any other project, couldn't you get them to make a youtube video to back up some of your statements? No one would know who put them out, and besides, I would love to see more of RE3.5 videos.

[News Bot]

Right, so you base everything on one debate where I wasn't the only one who hadn't witnessed an admittedly rare attack from an enemy in a game completely unrelated to this topic? What exactly does that prove? That I don't have encyclopedic knowledge of gameplay, which clearly means I don't happen to have spoken to the developers? God damn.

Now, what I want to know is, if you know someone on the RE3.5 project, or any other project, couldn't you get them to make a youtube video to back up some of your statements? No one would know who put them out, and besides, I would love to see more of RE3.5 videos.

That is embarrassingly unprofessional. There are no builds of "3.5" outside of CAPCOM. Former employees don't take them as some sort of severance package either. You're extremely lucky to get the information I've already given let alone more.

I'll say it again: None of it is my opinion. You can keep reiterating that suggestion, but it's never going to come true. If it is my opinion, I say so. If I say "this information came from the developers", then by Allah, it came from the developers.

[Enigmatism415]

Sometimes you just have to take someone's word for it. Theoretically, News Bot could be the most epic troll the community has ever seen. However, by all reasonable accounts, his word is better than most. I don't believe he'd have reason to lie to us, so I believe whatever he reports.

[Black~Crow]

Right, so you base everything on one debate where I wasn't the only one who hadn't witnessed an admittedly rare attack from an enemy in a game completely unrelated to this topic? What exactly does that prove? That I don't have encyclopedic knowledge of gameplay, which clearly means I don't happen to have spoken to the developers? God damn.



That is embarrassingly unprofessional. There are no builds of "3.5" outside of CAPCOM. Former employees don't take them as some sort of severance package either. You're extremely lucky to get the information I've already given let alone more.

I'll say it again: None of it is my opinion. You can keep reiterating that suggestion, but it's never going to come true. If it is my opinion, I say so. If I say "this information came from the developers", then by Allah, it came from the developers.

Unprofessional? You are the one claiming to know all this information, and then get snippy about someone asking you to provide proof. I see people here say you tell the truth about something and they know you are telling the truth, but how the hell would someone from the outside know that.

Why then do you come here to post things? You are like many others here, who are not honest, that like to argue about things. Most here are not friendly happy go luck people. I for one am a saint!