You say that it is a gross exaggeration to compare RE4 to RE1, yet RE1 is essentially the exact same game as REmake, which you rank just below RE4.
RE1 and REmake follow a similar path, which is different in several cases like the introduction of Lisa Trevor, but the script is much better.
If we are merely looking at the "script" - the cheese factor of dialogue, and pisspoor narrative justifiably ranks RE4 near the bottom, especially considering that it came out in 2005, 9 years after RE1, when video games had just entered a new era of storytelling.
You try to point out relative era to demean RE4 but what is really important is intent. RE4 was not intended to be serious and it wasn't.
RE4 is widely regarded to have a very, very poor story (which comes from the "script") - even amongst RE4 fans. And it is a reason many resort to claiming the game is a parody, to try to salvage a modicum of credibility.
Like every single other Resident Evil game ever.
Face it, RE4 has a BAD script, from the story to the dialogue to the worst video game villain ever in Salazar. It's still an amazingly well done game, with fun gameplay and great graphics.
And Salazar the worst villain ever? One would think a villain is only a sgood as they were intended to be and how they fulfill their role. Salazar was meant to annoy and irritate and he did that.
Contrast with Wesker who was intended to be awesome and failed every single time.
Douglas and Waugh tried to make him a good villain but their voicework just didn't compensate for the simple fact the source material was godawful.
But to rank it above REmake, RE3, and RE2 is ridiculous. I'd even rank it below RECVX, which is executed poorly and has some questionable content.
I disagree. RE4 and RE1's script are actually quite similar. Badly executed, intentionally cheesy horror lines. It's difficult to take your points seriously when you label anyone else's opinion as "illogical" or a "gross exaggeration".
If they said the storytelling was better than anything ever written by Mark Twain or William Shakespeare, you wouldn't call that illogical?
Comment