Wesker's Extra Report Translation

[Bertha]

Thanks for translating....and not to be a grammar/spelling Nazi...but resurrected was spelled incorrectly.

[Mr. Spencer]

Rosetta to the rescue! 'hanks for the backup.

[Guest]

Wonder how long it'll take before those socialist bastards at RE Wikia get hold of it.

So basically, RE Wikia are socialist bastards but ProjectUmbrella.net can publish the BSAA information I translated without asking for permission? I think it would be better for you people to stop acting like Captain Copyright if you cannot abide by your own rules.

If you release translations on the internet, be prepared for them to show up elsewhere, perhaps without giving credit to the source. You don't want information to be spread, you don't publish it in the first place.

Stuff like this only makes you look like wannabe-elitist idiots, which I hope you are not.

[Mr. Spencer]

Wait, this is the first I've heard of it. Mind you, I don't really follow what goes on at the site these days or what content is assembled. Thanks for bringing it to my attention though, I'll have to speak to News Bot about this. It is most embarassing to be accountable for the actions of others.

[News Bot]

So basically, RE Wikia are socialist bastards but ProjectUmbrella.net can publish the BSAA information I translated without asking for permission?

You weren't around at the time, which made contact near impossible, and we essentially mirrored yours with the proper link and credit provided. You never complained, so I assumed all was fine. If you had a problem, you should've stated as such and I would've promptly removed it. It's there because it's valuable background information that fills in a few things, which is what PU strives to provide. I didn't have any problem with the Wikia providing our article, what annoyed me was the lack of proper credit and a link to the source, which just shows that they did zero research on the matter and don't give a damn about providing sources. On the other hand, all of the material on PU that came from elsewhere is correctly labelled as such, and if someone such as you had an issue with that we would have no problem with removing it for your sake. PU doesn't require permission for articles to be pasted elsewhere, we only ask that proper credit be given just as we give proper credit to everyone else.

If you had an issue, you should've came to us before and stated your complaint instead of just bringing it up in a random forum topic. That's just immature. If you want it removed, I'll gladly do so.

Anyway, quit the bickering. "For those interested" wasn't for shits and giggles. If you don't care, don't bother posting for the sake of it.

[Mr. Spencer]

Free South Africa you dumb son of a bitch!

[Guest]

You weren't around at the time, which made contact near impossible, and we essentially mirrored yours with the proper link and credit provided. You never complained, so I assumed all was fine. If you had a problem, you should've stated as such and I would've promptly removed it. It's there because it's valuable background information that fills in a few things, which is what PU strives to provide. I didn't have any problem with the Wikia providing our article, what annoyed me was the lack of proper credit and a link to the source, which just shows that they did zero research on the matter and don't give a damn about providing sources. On the other hand, all of the material on PU that came from elsewhere is correctly labelled as such, and if someone such as you had an issue with that we would have no problem with removing it for your sake. PU doesn't require permission for articles to be pasted elsewhere, we only ask that proper credit be given just as we give proper credit to everyone else.

If you had an issue, you should've came to us before and stated your complaint instead of just bringing it up in a random forum topic. That's just immature. If you want it removed, I'll gladly do so.

Anyway, quit the bickering. "For those interested" wasn't for shits and giggles. If you don't care, don't bother posting for the sake of it.

Those who read the first page will know what I said, no matter how much you're trying. Continue with your "exclusive content not to be duplicated elsewhere", you'll see how far that will get you in due time.

[News Bot]

"exclusive content not to be duplicated elsewhere"

I see you didn't read. Nor do you have any idea about our policies. We have no problem if anything on PU is duplicated elsewhere, so long as credit is given, just as we give credit to you and everyone else responsible for material present on the site. It's a mirror of sources, as such. If you don't have any issue, why are you acting as though we've killed your dog?

Anyway, all done: http://projectumbrella.net/articles/...s-Extra-Report

[Dot50Cal]

Guys, can't we all just get along? Please take matters like this to PM's. Back on topic please.

[Stars1356]

This was a good read thanks for bringing it to our attention.

[missvalentine]

Thanks, that was pretty cool.

Also is Wesker's report 3 canon? and is this Wesker's report 4?

[News Bot]

There is no such thing as Wesker's Report 3 (complete fan-trash) or Wesker's Report 4.

There are only three reports, 1, 2 and the Extra Report.