Originally posted by fujin78
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Resident Evil 1.5 it's OVER
Collapse
X
-
Because we keep repeating several things -
1 - Capcom will never, ever make this game.
2 - The beta, unfinished version is out there in private hands, playable from one end to the other with only minor glitches.
3 - Someone's gonna sell it to make a profit eventually, and we're waiting with baited breath and a hand in the wallet.
4 - No one that we actually know has it can release it due to the hideous legal powers of Capcom's Lawyer Ninja team.
However, you keep asking the same questions over and over. We're aware that English isn't your first language but please, take the time to read what's being said and have a clear understanding before posting. It saves a certain level of frustration.
Comment
-
It's not anything against you, I know you're excited for 1.5, as a lot of fans are, and you enjoy sharing Beta photos. You just need to structure your posts a little better so it seems as if you're taking part in a discussion, not just posting one/two word things. Your continued PMing me earlier about Shawn having 1.5 when I asked you not to was a bit OTT as well. I have no idea if he has it, he's just a Capcom member of staff.
Comment
-
The answer to why we won't give out the names of the people who have 1.5 is flat out because we can't trust the community to behave or handle the information well, and that's not counting the fact we've obtained our leads and sources through amounts of trust and friendship that we don't want to break either. The amount of immaturity and stupidity that has happened in the past regarding to how the community reacts is a big reason. The Playstation Museum fiasco is a prime example. Curator is still constantly harassed and he doesn't even have the disc. Another source recently has backed out of giving some new information because some fool decided to try and scam him out of 1.5.
I don't mean to make it sound like everybody else is not good enough to know the info. Just that there are enough people who are too immature or just don't really know how to handle dealing with a source properly that it would not be wise for that kind of information to be public knowledge. It has proven so far that all it takes to ruin some things are a few bad apples.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Logical Operand View PostI disagree. The final version we got was definitely better in terms of quality, but all it was, was an improvement over the original game. It didn't really offer anything new. BH 1.5 was the original sequel to the first game, and it had a lot of innovative and fun stuff. It also had more atmosphere and character interaction, and had the horror vibe that the first game did. Leon in RE2 was more cool and composed, and seemed a bit angry at times. The Leon in 1.5 was more scared. They should have released 1.5, but they couldn't milk the series if they did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alzaire View PostThe Playstation Museum fiasco is a prime example. Curator is still constantly harassed and he doesn't even have the disc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rewak View PostThat was pretty much his own fault though, what with the video followed by pictures of him playing it followed by the million dollar eBay auction. But yeah, it is a prime example, people knew (or assumed) he had the game and he got hounded, and in the long run because of that i wouldn't be surprised if people who do have it would be a lot more reluctant to come forward.
Even so, though, Curator was being hounded and harassed long before any of the later events. And it is exactly as you say about future sources being reluctant to come forward because of it. I don't blame them.
woah...when was this??sigpic
Comment
Comment