Ya know I had hated RE Apocalypse ever since i saw it in theaters. But in preparation for a review I plan to do on the RE fim trilogy I rewatched it, along with Extinction. The opening and ending of Apocalypse alone serve as a testament of just how much more competent Umbrella is in the films than in the games.
Let's compare the one event the two universes have in common; the Raccoon City Outbreak. In the games not only was it Umbrella itself that causes the disaster the only remedy they have for it is to send in some ineffectual mercenaries. Everything else is left up to the US military.
In the movies, long before the city is infected, Umbrella has mobilized a fleet to evacuate all personel of importance. To contain the infection they buld an actual barricade (in contrast to the invisible barricade of the games....) and only allow out of the city those who pass their medical examination. When it becomes clear the infection cannot be contained they close off all manner of escape and decide to sterilize the city.
In the games Umbrella is held accountable for this atrocity which is logical. Their fingerprints were all over this disaster. In the movies even with video recorded evidence Umbrella manages to discredit it and its creators and pass off their nuking of the city asjust a reactor accident.
Now while that's the only event the worlds have in common, we still can compare them. How you may ask? Well let's look at all the facilities we've seen in the games.
-Training Facility
-Arklay Mountains
-Birkin's Lab
-Rockfort
-Sheena
-Russia
-Paris
All these facilities have been attacked or infiltrated and all of them have been subsequently destroyed exceot for the Paris one. Uuslaly this is done by two or three people of marginal talent.
Compare with the movies' Umbrella facilities. Years after the world has pretty much ended, they're still fully operational. TH eone site that is actually taken down is done so by a rogue scientist, not the the infected or anti-Umbrella figures.
Let's compare the one event the two universes have in common; the Raccoon City Outbreak. In the games not only was it Umbrella itself that causes the disaster the only remedy they have for it is to send in some ineffectual mercenaries. Everything else is left up to the US military.
In the movies, long before the city is infected, Umbrella has mobilized a fleet to evacuate all personel of importance. To contain the infection they buld an actual barricade (in contrast to the invisible barricade of the games....) and only allow out of the city those who pass their medical examination. When it becomes clear the infection cannot be contained they close off all manner of escape and decide to sterilize the city.
In the games Umbrella is held accountable for this atrocity which is logical. Their fingerprints were all over this disaster. In the movies even with video recorded evidence Umbrella manages to discredit it and its creators and pass off their nuking of the city asjust a reactor accident.
Now while that's the only event the worlds have in common, we still can compare them. How you may ask? Well let's look at all the facilities we've seen in the games.
-Training Facility
-Arklay Mountains
-Birkin's Lab
-Rockfort
-Sheena
-Russia
-Paris
All these facilities have been attacked or infiltrated and all of them have been subsequently destroyed exceot for the Paris one. Uuslaly this is done by two or three people of marginal talent.
Compare with the movies' Umbrella facilities. Years after the world has pretty much ended, they're still fully operational. TH eone site that is actually taken down is done so by a rogue scientist, not the the infected or anti-Umbrella figures.
Comment