Project Umbrella Updates

[News Bot]

Oh dear you're right. I got the March 23, 1967 and March 1968 dates mixed up haha. Thanks for pointing that out. xD

[wesker RPD]

A few suggestions:

* Barry should have Gaiden listed at the bottom of the page under Games/Film since Leon's article has it

* Jill should have RE5 and the Pachislot listed since Chris and Wesker have them

* Jill needs a profile pic for her article

http://projectumbrella.net/articles/Jill-Valentine

http://projectumbrella.net/articles/Barry-Burton

[Guest]

* Barry should have Gaiden listed at the bottom of the page under Games/Film since Leon's article has it

Also, GAIDEN should be listed as canon to cause some people's heads to explode.

[Archelon]

I would like to see theories distinguished from fact in the articles. It wouldn't be all that difficult, either. You could simply say, "It is theorized by the Project Umbrella staff that..." or some similar derivation. No articles, as it currently stands, does this.

[5 Minutes]

I would like to see theories distinguished from fact in the articles. It wouldn't be all that difficult, either. You could simply say, "It is theorized by the Project Umbrella staff that..." or some similar derivation. No articles, as it currently stands, does this.

Thank-you for pointing that out. I appreciate all the overly analyzed theories, but I need the concrete and the myths separated. All that integration of what PU has essentially 'made up' and canon files are bringing about a new non-Canon Resident Evil.

[Darkmoon]

Maybe colour code the information? One colour for the official games, another for unoffical games, another for trusted sourcebooks and the like...

[Carnivol]

^That's actually a pretty good idea. Color codes (optional?) combined with standard reference/source citing system. Let there be a legend at the bottom of the page that tells you what the colors represent (either global or pr. article, evt. w/recurring patterns)

[News Bot]

I would like to see theories distinguished from fact in the articles. It wouldn't be all that difficult, either. You could simply say, "It is theorized by the Project Umbrella staff that..." or some similar derivation. No articles, as it currently stands, does this.

There are no theories in the articles, though. We don't add theoretical information, and if it is, its labelled as such.

* Barry should have Gaiden listed at the bottom of the page under Games/Film since Leon's article has it

* Jill should have RE5 and the Pachislot listed since Chris and Wesker have them

* Jill needs a profile pic for her article

Thanks, I'll add those in soon. As for the profile pic, that's a site glitch which resets the option to display a picture, I'll fix that when I add RE5 and Pachislot.

Thank-you for pointing that out. I appreciate all the overly analyzed theories, but I need the concrete and the myths separated. All that integration of what PU has essentially 'made up' and canon files are bringing about a new non-Canon Resident Evil.

Generally everything on PU is concrete, considering 1) all of the information is taken directly from official sources and 2) we mostly just re-write the original material from several sources in the form of an article. We don't fabricate or embellish.

[Archelon]

There are no theories in the articles, though. We don't add theoretical information, and if it is, its labelled as such.

Not in your Las Plagas article, unless you've changed it since the last time I read it.

It's not just that one, either. Just about every article you have one the site regarding Las Plagas states that Ada sent Wesker modified subordinate plagas while she sent the control plaga to The Organization, when there's really no evidence to back that up other than the fact that Wesker somehow obtained Las Plagas between the events of RE4 and RE5. Not to mention, there's nothing to say that the samples Ada acquired were modified subordinate plagas and not just regular subordinate plagas.

This has been discussed before, obviously.

[News Bot]

Not in your Las Plagas article, unless you've changed it since the last time I read it.

What, the modified subordinate Plagas? That is from an official source. What's your point? =/

[Archelon]

What, the modified subordinate Plagas? That is from an official source. What's your point? =/

I would like to see the source, please, because I have yet to see anything that states that Ada sent Wesker any plagas at all other than her comment about sending Wesker a "different present." Or, for that matter, where it's stated that the plagas Ada obtained are modified subordinate plagas.

[News Bot]

Soo... magic? That's pretty much the logic you're applying. =P

Also, Ada steals various different Plaga samples. One of them is the Plaga used to develop El Gigante (used later to develop Ndesu). As well as the regular Plagas (used to develop Type 2 Plagas).

[Archelon]

I'm failing to see a source in any of your posts, despite your claims that everything is taken from official sources.

If your source is simply that Wesker has samples of Las Plagas in his possession, that's a pretty weak link when the whole point of Separate Ways was essentially to show that Ada was not, in fact, working with Wesker, and that she did not send him anything after all was said and done, let alone a modified subordinate plaga or several different variations of the plaga parasite.

Plus there's the fact that Irving works for Ada, and he's a bioweapons dealer. Wesker could have just as easily obtained samples of Las Plagas from him.

I think it should also be pointed out that there is no indication that a different type of plaga was used to create El Gigante other than the difference in mutation, which is the explanation you gave for claiming Krauser was injected with a different type of plaga, as well. However, as we have seen countless times from the way Capcom uses the T-Virus, a different mutation is hardly enough evidence to make the claim that an entirely different parasite was utilized.

[News Bot]

biohazard 4 Kaitaishinsho ~ page 132
biohazard 5 Kaitaishinsho ~ page 268, 278

Also, Ada not working with Wesker doesn't mean she doesn't send him anything. For one thing, her objective is solely to retrieve the Control Plaga for The Organization to study and confirm/disprove certain theories. You're kind of jumping the gun yourself there by instantly saying that she didn't send him anything at all despite it being confirmed by her herself.

Plus there's the fact that Irving works for Ada, and he's a bioweapons dealer. Wesker could have just as easily obtained samples of Las Plagas from him.

Wesker also apparently sells out Ada (who is apparently a man and an Umbrella spy according to Wesker) to Javier Hidalgo in the DSC files. What's your point? And the LiN files are just as poorly translated, such as the "thousands of test subjects" line. Also, she is still working with Wesker according to the LiN files. That nullifies your entire point.

I think it should also be pointed out that there is no indication that a different type of plaga was used to create El Gigante other than the difference in mutation, which is the explanation you gave for claiming Krauser was injected with a different type of plaga, as well. However, as we have seen countless times from the way Capcom uses the T-Virus, a different mutation is hardly enough evidence to make the claim that an entirely different parasite was utilized.

The biography pages for El Gigante ("Created by the application of experimental giant parasite.") and Ndesu confirm that the Plagas used are different, which is also the same for Krauser, U-3, Verdugo, Novistador and the Regenerador. There's also these:

[Guest]

There are no theories in the articles, though. We don't add theoretical information, and if it is, its labelled as such.

The Las Plagas article before said that Irving got the parasites through his black market contacts. And now it just talks about a modified subordinate Plaga though there is evidence against that.

If those are not theories, I don't know what they are.