I'm sorry but I still can't believe people feel the need to justify Jill's RE3 outfit from a "logical" standpoint when I believe Capcom's track record with their designs and statements make it plainly obvious her outfit was almost completely designed for city girl sex appeal. Even from a girl who's personal clothing experience claims a justification, the arguments just don't really hold enough water. I don't think the arguments are total bunk and far-fetched, just like I also believe her outfit isn't total "cheep hooker" either. But still, I don't buy into it because I have similar experience as Enetirnel as I was in the boy scouts for about 9 years until my grandfather passed away. I would definitely agree that wearing baggy clothes and such are obvious bad ideas, but the way Enetirnel describes things then everyone might as well run around naked with a few rubber bands tightly holding a keycard to your leg or arm. I did a lot of similar things like repelling, hiking, climbing, and even in the southern US during the summer when, yes, it got pretty hot and sweaty, I personally never felt so bothered by my clothing that I wanted to strip down to the bare minimum just because it would be the most efficient and "comfortable." The problem stems from the issue that the defense are relying too much on too deep, situational "tacticality" and (personal) comfortability (not to mention Jill defense forces that would find ways to justify if Jill murdered a hundred babies).
Jill is smart and I'm sure she has her own tastes in clothes, but I think many of the arguments for her attire don't stand up within their own arguments. A bit of comfortability needs to be sacrificed for personal safety and base tactics. She was a police officer and ex-Delta Force, she should be used to tactical gear and decisions, and she even has experience with the zombies and such already. Let's address a few things then.
- Baggy clothes are not good. Agreed.
- 'Hot weather, long clothes, shirts, ect. get wet, tough to move in, aren't comfortable. ect' This one is being perceived too much from a general standpoint. The points are somewhat valid, but they are also being perceived from sports or recreational activities.
-Clothes can get snagged, can't shimmy into tight spaces, ect. Understandable, to a degree. As said before, obvious baggy clothes would be stupid, but more fitting clothes should be more acceptable. It's one of the tradeoffs that would probably be better to make in an RE type situation. In every-day life with sports and stuff, it makes less of a difference. But if you're moving through tight spaces and snaggy objects that much, then you're really gonna be in trouble either way. In a regular situation, a few scrapes and cuts from wearing less clothing probably won't hurt or affect you much. In a t-virus infected city, it would probably be more wise to protect against cuts and scrapes as best you can with some fitted clothing. I'd much rather a zombie rip my shirt or scratch on some leather, then have immediate access straight to bare shoulders, legs, back, arms, ect. and scratch open flesh and infect me. "oh but if you're wearing clothes or gear, they could grab them and hold on or that fence could snag on your pants!" well, yeah, but good lord you might as well go naked if you're gonna be that paranoid of your clothing screwing you over rather than sensible defense.
Avoiding enemies and such is a smart idea sure, but Jill isn't a regular girl where that's the only option. While we can't really know the true range of her thoughts, it should be expected that not only is she willing to help out anyone she might come across if she can, she -knows- she is going to have to fight almost certainly many times before she escapes the city whether it coincides with the helping of others or not. She should have some gear to prepare her for this kind of combat and expectation. Jill's smart, but she's also a fighter. She has no legitimate excuse for her attire considering the overall situation. I can understand the arguments made for her attire under general situation and specific situations, but they really don't hold up under the broad view as to -Jill- herself and the full situation. Sure, -you- may be more comfortable in her clothes, -you- might 'understand' them under specific arguments, but -you- are also not Jill Valentine and (likely) have not trained in tactical gear, trained in combat, experienced combat, experienced a t-virus outbreak, ect. She's used to that kind of stuff. So while the absolute bare minimum might be understandable or good for some of ya'll, she has enough experience to know it would be in her overall best interest to protect herself/body and how to dress for it and be comfortable doing so.
Otherwise, why don't we all just outfit our police and soldiers in mini-skirts and boobtubes (and full topless and tight undies for the males, to be fair) in areas of warm weather? Would make chasing those bad guys easier, and jumping those fences after those bad guys less to get snagged on, more comfy and all that. Wait, no, that would be retarded. Raccoon City is a combat zone. She may be wanting to get out of there ASAP, sure, but it's still a damn combat zone. This isn't rock climbing or a recreational jog through the park. The situation requires more than what Jill's RE3 outfit is. It was chosen purely for sex appeal.
Jill is smart and I'm sure she has her own tastes in clothes, but I think many of the arguments for her attire don't stand up within their own arguments. A bit of comfortability needs to be sacrificed for personal safety and base tactics. She was a police officer and ex-Delta Force, she should be used to tactical gear and decisions, and she even has experience with the zombies and such already. Let's address a few things then.
- Baggy clothes are not good. Agreed.
- 'Hot weather, long clothes, shirts, ect. get wet, tough to move in, aren't comfortable. ect' This one is being perceived too much from a general standpoint. The points are somewhat valid, but they are also being perceived from sports or recreational activities.
-Clothes can get snagged, can't shimmy into tight spaces, ect. Understandable, to a degree. As said before, obvious baggy clothes would be stupid, but more fitting clothes should be more acceptable. It's one of the tradeoffs that would probably be better to make in an RE type situation. In every-day life with sports and stuff, it makes less of a difference. But if you're moving through tight spaces and snaggy objects that much, then you're really gonna be in trouble either way. In a regular situation, a few scrapes and cuts from wearing less clothing probably won't hurt or affect you much. In a t-virus infected city, it would probably be more wise to protect against cuts and scrapes as best you can with some fitted clothing. I'd much rather a zombie rip my shirt or scratch on some leather, then have immediate access straight to bare shoulders, legs, back, arms, ect. and scratch open flesh and infect me. "oh but if you're wearing clothes or gear, they could grab them and hold on or that fence could snag on your pants!" well, yeah, but good lord you might as well go naked if you're gonna be that paranoid of your clothing screwing you over rather than sensible defense.
Avoiding enemies and such is a smart idea sure, but Jill isn't a regular girl where that's the only option. While we can't really know the true range of her thoughts, it should be expected that not only is she willing to help out anyone she might come across if she can, she -knows- she is going to have to fight almost certainly many times before she escapes the city whether it coincides with the helping of others or not. She should have some gear to prepare her for this kind of combat and expectation. Jill's smart, but she's also a fighter. She has no legitimate excuse for her attire considering the overall situation. I can understand the arguments made for her attire under general situation and specific situations, but they really don't hold up under the broad view as to -Jill- herself and the full situation. Sure, -you- may be more comfortable in her clothes, -you- might 'understand' them under specific arguments, but -you- are also not Jill Valentine and (likely) have not trained in tactical gear, trained in combat, experienced combat, experienced a t-virus outbreak, ect. She's used to that kind of stuff. So while the absolute bare minimum might be understandable or good for some of ya'll, she has enough experience to know it would be in her overall best interest to protect herself/body and how to dress for it and be comfortable doing so.
Otherwise, why don't we all just outfit our police and soldiers in mini-skirts and boobtubes (and full topless and tight undies for the males, to be fair) in areas of warm weather? Would make chasing those bad guys easier, and jumping those fences after those bad guys less to get snagged on, more comfy and all that. Wait, no, that would be retarded. Raccoon City is a combat zone. She may be wanting to get out of there ASAP, sure, but it's still a damn combat zone. This isn't rock climbing or a recreational jog through the park. The situation requires more than what Jill's RE3 outfit is. It was chosen purely for sex appeal.
Comment