Operation Raccoon City - Which platform are you getting?

[Guest]

On the red ringer.

Next time that happens to me, or I ever get the YLoD on my PS3, I'm just going to try fix it my self...

[Upaluppa]

YLoD made me loose the ability to play PS2 games on my PS3.
I got the slim model as a replacement and I'm not too fond of it.

Anyways, I don't have a 360 and I prefer using my 12" notebook instead of an oversized desktop computer, so for me all versions except for the PS3 one are out of question!

[Mr. Spencer]

Looking at the poll results I am astonished at the majority falling in the PS3's favour. Such a thing would have been almost unheard of four or five years ago. The PS3 is starting to become the dominant console, almost twenty people who participated in the poll have selected the PS3 as their console of choice for ORC.

[aris13]

^Trey for life son.

Although I wish I had a 360 so I could play Deadly Premonition.

[Canas Renvall]

I'm fortunate enough to have the PSWiiC60. 360 has, in my experience, always had better online play for the consoles, and most of my friends are there, so 360 first. Then later on, I'm sure I'll buy it from Steam for my laptop.

[Dracarys]

Needs a multiple choice answer.

[Canas Renvall]

Seconded. I definitely am getting the 360 version, and probably the PC version too. So I just chose 360 for now.

[REmaster]

Playstation 3 for me as well.

[jimmyjoejangles]

PS3 I DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS ANYTHING ELSE

[Mr. Spencer]

TREY 4 LYFE

[misstvirus]

360 because I love my 360 and I can't afford a PS3 <(_ _;<)

[Guest]

Then your username is very fitting!

It's not an opinion that 1st party games mostly look better on PS3, it's fact.

Fixed.

[Stu]

No, it was fine in the first place actually.

[Guest]

I';v never once seen a 360 game with better graphics then the ps3 version but i have seen more then one game with better graphics on the ps3.... Anyways, i'm getting it for ps3 !

360

http://images.eurogamer.net/assets/articles//a/1/2/7/4/8/7/4/textures_360_2.jpg.jpg

PS3

http://images.eurogamer.net/assets/articles//a/1/2/7/4/8/7/4/textures_ps3_2.jpg.jpg

No, it was fine in the first place actually.

Really, it's not. 1st party games and games that were designed for the PS3 will always be superiour to the 360 because they're designed with the hardware in mind and with the PS3 being the more powerful system it makes accurate ports to the 360 impossible without compromises (i.e. FFXIII), either that or they never get ported (i.e. MGS4). You'd think this makes graphics on the PS3 better 100% of the time, but in actuality the 360 has more resources available to improve the overall look of graphical detail that the PS3 simply can not do quite as well, namely anit-aliasing techniques. In these cases developers who build their games on the 360 platform and port to the PS3 (which a lot of companies do with it being easier to develop for), often fail to achieve equal results because the same kind of resources on the PS3 either aren't there, or they can't afford to employ them. It varies from game to game, and developer to developer, and a lot of the time the results are so negligable you could pick and choose faults in many different games and technical areas. But it's not a fact that games mostly look better on the PS3, it's actually pretty even, the 360 maybe even having the upper hand on considerable portion of multiplatform titles.

Anyway, I'm getting this thread of track lol, sorry for the rant...

[Stu]

But we're not even talking about first party EXCLUSIVE titles, it's a third party multiformat release, what you're on about isn't even relevant.