What would you rather have?

[Darkmoon]

Well, if they did it in a classic style with the same philosophy they had for REmake, it would be awesome. And I admit, I feel tingly imagining a combined RE2/RE3 game with today's graphics...and not on rails, fuck you Capcom again for that.

I just honestly doubt Capcom would do it. They have the capacity to do to so, obviously, but I can't help but foresee marketing come in going, 'Oh, those tank controls won't sell, can you switch it to third person aiming...oh, and let's make it more actiony, have some run and gun in there, and puzzles will just break up the flow, and exploration will just mean time not shooting stuff and zombies aren't cool any more, everyone is doing zombies, let's make the enemies something new...'

And then I kill them all.

[OKeijiDragon]

Fuck 6. That'll come no matter what.

I want a RE2 remake.

[Scream]

I want Resident Evil 4: Umbrella Rising.. the version I got is the opposite.. A RE2make would also be awesome if done in classic RE style..

[ShadowHeart]

As long as they would keep the original camera angel and stuff of the classic RE's... I would choose RE2 remake. It truly is my favorite RE game. I'm not excited for 6 at all to be honest if they ever DO make it.

[Grem]

None. Considering REmake disappointed me a little bit, I'm not very confident that a RE2 remake would be as good as the original.

RE6, I don't care. RE5 kinda closed the book.

And a Remake of the remake of the first game would be stupid.

In fact, I don't expect anything from this series now. I'd like an old school RE game with RE4 gameplay and that's pretty much Revelations. So, that's just fine for me.

[BrionIrons]

Wow,This is the first i ever heard that RE1 ReMake actually disappointed someone.

anyway.I vote RE2 Remake.RE6 ain't coming out for a while.(4-8 year wait like Capcom said).

[rehunk88]

stupid question resident evil 6 of course we have to move foward not backwards.

[Stu]

stupid question resident evil 6 of course we have to move foward not backwards.

But...But...

No, I won't

[BrionIrons]

stupid question resident evil 6 of course we have to move foward not backwards.

true but there isn't anything wrong with going back to the classic titles.

[Darkmoon]

stupid question resident evil 6 of course we have to move foward not backwards.

Care to tell that to Capcom? There current policy seems to be, 'Crap, what do we do now? Let's do a bunch of stuff set before RE5 so we have time to work out how to milk the cash cow.' I do expect news of RE6 relatively soon, although 'relatively' could mean sometime next year after the current batch of games has been baked and served.

Which doesn't mean we might not get another Remake of something in the meantime, of course. They're easier than a new game because most of the plot, level design and enemies have already been done.

[Beanovsky Durst]

Fail. There's no option for a REBOOT.

But between those three I'll take Resident 6.

[let me live]

RE6 as a reboot. If I wanted to experience RE2 again, I'd play RE2.

[rehunk88]

But...But...

No, I won't

yeah now you want to say outbreak or some stupid shit like that but outbreak isent what the Op asked for in this topic so shut pie hole

[Stu]

It just intrigued me that the kid who throws his toys out of the pram the most when someone slates Outbreak, saying how much he wants it back is in this thread saying "we have to move forward".

It's hilarious, i'm a massive fan of irony you see.

[rehunk88]

You´re just a asshole thats all, this topic is clearly not about outbreak and got nothing to do with it... its not included in it, so im not suprised that you of course think outbreak .. but thats only because your an ass.
end of story.