Does rebuying the untold stories pack mess with your DLC save at all? I've bought them individually way back when.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Xbox LIVE - Deals of the Week - RE5 add-ons
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Branden_Lucero View Postyeah, which is stupid in my opinion. i rather they package it on a 2nd disc and install whatever you wanted individually, like fallout 3/ oblivion add-ons on disc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stu View PostYeah, and then let people pass the disc around to as many people as they want to. Capcom would let that happen.
Comment
-
Not entirely sure what the codes in the Gold Edition are, but if I've understood it right, it's got a code for Versus and Untold Stories (and Extra Figures -which is free- must be downloaded separately).
Unless they updated the disc to just contain the final version of Versus + evt. Extra Figures and the pack-in is just for Extra Figures...
I'll probably know later, since I'm probably grabbing a PAL Gold Edition for the 360 sooner or later (to go with my regular and steelcase initial releases).
Originally posted by a STARS member View PostDoes rebuying the untold stories pack mess with your DLC save at all? I've bought them individually way back when.
Originally posted by Stu View PostYeah, and then let people pass the disc around to as many people as they want to. Capcom would let that happen.
In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if they'd managed to somehow mysteriously squeeze all the Resident Evil 5 DLC in on the main disc if they absolutely wanted to. They worked some sort of digital magic on the Lost Planet disc when they released Colonies Edition.
Not only was the Colonies Edition disc 200mb smaller than the original version's disc, but it also contained the DLC maps for the initial release (650mb-ish DLC in total), a pile of new models for pretty much everything (player chars, VS, weapons, Akrids, etc.), some new game modes and a fistful of new maps exclusive to Colonies Edition. Though, I guess what wizardry they performed there might've already been in action on Resident Evil 5.
Originally posted by Branden_Lucero View Posti would rather have 1 disc go around to determine whether the content is worth it to be people than waste money they'll never get back on something that isn't.
(In all seriousness: Passing a disc like that around would not only be illegal, but also bad for business. Everytime a non-purchase user shows up with it, you'd pretty much be one step closer to: "There goes $5~15... Guess we'll never do this again... since we're getting ever so closer to being officially broke/bankrupt :/")
Comment
-
Originally posted by Branden_Lucero View Postseems like Stu is always so attractive to me.
Moon, it's hard to say what the costs will be that far ahead in the future. As data continues to grow with every generation of machines, the size of current DLC will be peanuts.
Comment
-
If bandwidth costs keep in line with the growth in data, the chance of profit (no matter how minimal) should still be there. Look at games from ten years or so ago now perhaps. Those games still pick up fans to this day. Resident Evil will inevitably be the same for a few decades to come yet.
It's going to come down in one way or another to customer loyalty to. Whether the big dogs like EA or Capcom believe the content to be relevant enough to need continued stocking on their servers.
If people have paid for their item, they should NEVER be refused access to it at any point. So it might even be an issue for trading standards to even look into.
Comment
Comment